- PLoS One. 2022; 17(6): e0270103. »
- Decision Letter 0
2022; 17 (6) : e0270103. Penned online 2022 Jun 31. doi: /log.pone.0270103.r001 Johnson Chun-Sing Cheung, Area Editor Copyright laws © 2022 Johnson Chun-Sing Cheung
This is an open availability post marketed according to the regards to the Creative Commons Attribution Licenses, and therefore permits unrestricted have fun with, shipments, and you can reproduction in any medium, given the initial copywriter and supply are credited.
If you prefer to make alter towards the economic disclosure, delight is your own up-to-date declaration in your cover letter
Just after consideration, we believe this keeps quality but does not totally meet PLOS Your publication criteria because already really stands. Hence, i ask one complete a revised form of the fresh new manuscript you to definitely address the new points elevated when you look at the opinion techniques.
Delight fill out your modified manuscript because of the . If you will you want more hours than this to do your own news, please react to this content otherwise contact brand new record place of work at When you’re ready to submit the enhance, get on and select the fresh ‘Submissions Searching for Revision’ folder so you’re able to to obtain their manuscript file.
A good rebuttal page that responds to each area increased by informative editor and reviewer(s). You ought to publish that it page since the a special document labeled ‘Response to help you Reviewers’.
A marked-right up copy of the manuscript one to shows alter made to the new brand-new variation. You should upload it because a special file branded ‘Revised Manuscript with Track Changes’.
A keen unmarked sort of your modified paper without monitored alter. You ought to publish that it as the yet another document labeled ‘Manuscript’.
If appropriate, we recommend that your put the lab protocols directly into increase the fresh reproducibility of one’s results. assigns their method its identifier (DOI) so that it would be cited on their own later on. To own rules come across: On top of that, PLOS You to has the benefit of a selection for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Method blogs, and therefore identify protocols managed on . Read more information about revealing protocols in the
1. Please make sure your manuscript suits PLOS A person’s style requirements, and men and women to have file naming. Brand new PLOS You to definitely build layouts exists at
“That it project are supported by a victims away from Crime Act (VOCA) federal solution-due to offer approved to your workplace of one’s Texas Governor (OOG) Youngster Sex Trafficking Party and you can Traffick911. The new recruit of this protocol – Traffick911 – possess assisted for the studies construction and you may study collection bundle explained within method. Traffick911 administrators keeps approved new protocol demonstrated here. The latest opinions, findings, findings, and you can recommendations indicated inside guide are the ones of journalist(s) and don’t fundamentally mirror brand new feedback of VOCA, OOG, otherwise Traffick911.
Excite state just what part this new funders grabbed from the study. In case your funders had no character, excite county: “”The new funders didn’t come with character when you look at the study construction, data collection and data, decision to post, otherwise preparing of your manuscript.””
Delight are this revised Part off Funder statement on your cover letter; we will replace the on the web distribution function on your behalf.
step 3. Your own stability statement will be merely appear in the methods element of the manuscript. Whether your stability report is written in any point together with the Actions, delight delete it off various other section https://worldbrides.org/sv/singleslavic-recension/.
Reviewer #1: This process relates to an important comparison out-of a keen anti-sex trafficking program, together with ensuing analyses will almost certainly become a significant introduction toward job
p2: The brand new figure to have 3 hundred,000 on-chance teens is made clear, given that bounds in which young people are believed at risk in so it admission aren’t the same as people used up later within the the methods to determine hence men and women are “at risk” and you may eligible for the applying. What might be modified during these introductory paragraphs and also in the ways to make it clear toward viewer that discrepancy is present.